Automation for legal departments
Fewer hours reading to find one clause, and no deadline that depends on somebody remembering.
An in-house legal team is always small for what's asked of it. Time goes on reviewing contracts that closely resemble each other, hunting for which matter held a particular clause, and watching deadlines in a calendar someone has to maintain by hand. The risk isn't in the legal judgement — it's in what gets missed.
What we automate here
- 01
Contract review and comparison
Incoming contracts checked against your template and your list of non-negotiable clauses, with deviations flagged and ranked by severity so reading starts with what matters.
- 02
Document generation
Contracts, powers of attorney, NDAs and annexes generated from templates using the matter's own data, numbered and routed for signature. No copy-pasting between versions.
- 03
Deadlines and expiries
Renewals, notice periods, procedural deadlines and contractual obligations extracted from the documents themselves and monitored, with escalating alerts to the owner before it's late.
- 04
Matter traceability
Every document, version, signature and communication tied to its matter, with a full record of who did what and when, available without asking by email.
- 05
Search across your own archive
Ask in plain language and get the answer with the exact document and clause cited, rather than a summary with no source.
What we build on
We work on top of SharePoint, Google Workspace, iManage or whichever document system you run, with e-signature already integrated. Nothing forces the archive to move.
Questions from this sector
- Do documents leave our infrastructure?
- By default, no. We design so the archive stays where it is and processing happens inside your perimeter or within the EU. Where a specific step needs an external service, it's scoped, documented and approved by you first.
- Does the AI decide on clauses?
- No. It flags deviations from your templates and prioritises them. The legal decision is always human, and the system records what it flagged and what was done — precisely so it's auditable.
- Does it work with a messy archive?
- Yes, and that's usually the situation. The first phase normalises and classifies what exists, which is valuable on its own because it makes an archive searchable that currently isn't.